{ "cells": [ { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "b73c8f7f", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 0 }, "source": [ "# 编译器和解释器\n", ":label:`sec_hybridize`\n", "\n", "目前为止,本书主要关注的是*命令式编程*(imperative programming)。\n", "命令式编程使用诸如`print`、“`+`”和`if`之类的语句来更改程序的状态。\n", "考虑下面这段简单的命令式程序:\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "code", "execution_count": 1, "id": "2f96dffd", "metadata": { "execution": { "iopub.execute_input": "2023-08-18T06:58:16.571866Z", "iopub.status.busy": "2023-08-18T06:58:16.571326Z", "iopub.status.idle": "2023-08-18T06:58:16.580794Z", "shell.execute_reply": "2023-08-18T06:58:16.579992Z" }, "origin_pos": 1, "tab": [ "pytorch" ] }, "outputs": [ { "name": "stdout", "output_type": "stream", "text": [ "10\n" ] } ], "source": [ "def add(a, b):\n", " return a + b\n", "\n", "def fancy_func(a, b, c, d):\n", " e = add(a, b)\n", " f = add(c, d)\n", " g = add(e, f)\n", " return g\n", "\n", "print(fancy_func(1, 2, 3, 4))" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "fa1758bc", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 2 }, "source": [ "Python是一种*解释型语言*(interpreted language)。因此,当对上面的`fancy_func`函数求值时,它按顺序执行函数体的操作。也就是说,它将通过对`e = add(a, b)`求值,并将结果存储为变量`e`,从而更改程序的状态。接下来的两个语句`f = add(c, d)`和`g = add(e, f)`也将执行类似地操作,即执行加法计算并将结果存储为变量。 :numref:`fig_compute_graph`说明了数据流。\n", "\n", "![命令式编程中的数据流](../img/computegraph.svg)\n", ":label:`fig_compute_graph`\n", "\n", "尽管命令式编程很方便,但可能效率不高。一方面原因,Python会单独执行这三个函数的调用,而没有考虑`add`函数在`fancy_func`中被重复调用。如果在一个GPU(甚至多个GPU)上执行这些命令,那么Python解释器产生的开销可能会非常大。此外,它需要保存`e`和`f`的变量值,直到`fancy_func`中的所有语句都执行完毕。这是因为程序不知道在执行语句`e = add(a, b)`和`f = add(c, d)`之后,其他部分是否会使用变量`e`和`f`。\n", "\n", "## 符号式编程\n", "\n", "考虑另一种选择*符号式编程*(symbolic programming),即代码通常只在完全定义了过程之后才执行计算。这个策略被多个深度学习框架使用,包括Theano和TensorFlow(后者已经获得了命令式编程的扩展)。一般包括以下步骤:\n", "\n", "1. 定义计算流程;\n", "1. 将流程编译成可执行的程序;\n", "1. 给定输入,调用编译好的程序执行。\n", "\n", "这将允许进行大量的优化。首先,在大多数情况下,我们可以跳过Python解释器。从而消除因为多个更快的GPU与单个CPU上的单个Python线程搭配使用时产生的性能瓶颈。其次,编译器可以将上述代码优化和重写为`print((1 + 2) + (3 + 4))`甚至`print(10)`。因为编译器在将其转换为机器指令之前可以看到完整的代码,所以这种优化是可以实现的。例如,只要某个变量不再需要,编译器就可以释放内存(或者从不分配内存),或者将代码转换为一个完全等价的片段。下面,我们将通过模拟命令式编程来进一步了解符号式编程的概念。\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "code", "execution_count": 2, "id": "ccb650c9", "metadata": { "execution": { "iopub.execute_input": "2023-08-18T06:58:16.584271Z", "iopub.status.busy": "2023-08-18T06:58:16.583746Z", "iopub.status.idle": "2023-08-18T06:58:16.589230Z", "shell.execute_reply": "2023-08-18T06:58:16.588464Z" }, "origin_pos": 3, "tab": [ "pytorch" ] }, "outputs": [ { "name": "stdout", "output_type": "stream", "text": [ "\n", "def add(a, b):\n", " return a + b\n", "\n", "def fancy_func(a, b, c, d):\n", " e = add(a, b)\n", " f = add(c, d)\n", " g = add(e, f)\n", " return g\n", "print(fancy_func(1, 2, 3, 4))\n", "10\n" ] } ], "source": [ "def add_():\n", " return '''\n", "def add(a, b):\n", " return a + b\n", "'''\n", "\n", "def fancy_func_():\n", " return '''\n", "def fancy_func(a, b, c, d):\n", " e = add(a, b)\n", " f = add(c, d)\n", " g = add(e, f)\n", " return g\n", "'''\n", "\n", "def evoke_():\n", " return add_() + fancy_func_() + 'print(fancy_func(1, 2, 3, 4))'\n", "\n", "prog = evoke_()\n", "print(prog)\n", "y = compile(prog, '', 'exec')\n", "exec(y)" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "2054d959", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 4 }, "source": [ "命令式(解释型)编程和符号式编程的区别如下:\n", "\n", "* 命令式编程更容易使用。在Python中,命令式编程的大部分代码都是简单易懂的。命令式编程也更容易调试,这是因为无论是获取和打印所有的中间变量值,或者使用Python的内置调试工具都更加简单;\n", "* 符号式编程运行效率更高,更易于移植。符号式编程更容易在编译期间优化代码,同时还能够将程序移植到与Python无关的格式中,从而允许程序在非Python环境中运行,避免了任何潜在的与Python解释器相关的性能问题。\n", "\n", "## 混合式编程\n", "\n", "历史上,大部分深度学习框架都在命令式编程与符号式编程之间进行选择。例如,Theano、TensorFlow(灵感来自前者)、Keras和CNTK采用了符号式编程。相反地,Chainer和PyTorch采取了命令式编程。在后来的版本更新中,TensorFlow2.0和Keras增加了命令式编程。\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "2bc27dfe", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 6, "tab": [ "pytorch" ] }, "source": [ "如上所述,PyTorch是基于命令式编程并且使用动态计算图。为了能够利用符号式编程的可移植性和效率,开发人员思考能否将这两种编程模型的优点结合起来,于是就产生了torchscript。torchscript允许用户使用纯命令式编程进行开发和调试,同时能够将大多数程序转换为符号式程序,以便在需要产品级计算性能和部署时使用。\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "b88d0031", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 9 }, "source": [ "## `Sequential`的混合式编程\n", "\n", "要了解混合式编程的工作原理,最简单的方法是考虑具有多层的深层网络。按照惯例,Python解释器需要执行所有层的代码来生成一条指令,然后将该指令转发到CPU或GPU。对于单个的(快速的)计算设备,这不会导致任何重大问题。另一方面,如果我们使用先进的8-GPU服务器,比如AWS P3dn.24xlarge实例,Python将很难让所有的GPU都保持忙碌。在这里,瓶颈是单线程的Python解释器。让我们看看如何通过将`Sequential`替换为`HybridSequential`来解决代码中这个瓶颈。首先,我们定义一个简单的多层感知机。\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "code", "execution_count": 3, "id": "65533e8b", "metadata": { "execution": { "iopub.execute_input": "2023-08-18T06:58:16.592892Z", "iopub.status.busy": "2023-08-18T06:58:16.592388Z", "iopub.status.idle": "2023-08-18T06:58:18.663997Z", "shell.execute_reply": "2023-08-18T06:58:18.662987Z" }, "origin_pos": 11, "tab": [ "pytorch" ] }, "outputs": [ { "data": { "text/plain": [ "tensor([[ 0.0722, -0.0190]], grad_fn=)" ] }, "execution_count": 3, "metadata": {}, "output_type": "execute_result" } ], "source": [ "import torch\n", "from torch import nn\n", "from d2l import torch as d2l\n", "\n", "\n", "# 生产网络的工厂模式\n", "def get_net():\n", " net = nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(512, 256),\n", " nn.ReLU(),\n", " nn.Linear(256, 128),\n", " nn.ReLU(),\n", " nn.Linear(128, 2))\n", " return net\n", "\n", "x = torch.randn(size=(1, 512))\n", "net = get_net()\n", "net(x)" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "c4c394a8", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 15, "tab": [ "pytorch" ] }, "source": [ "通过使用`torch.jit.script`函数来转换模型,我们就有能力编译和优化多层感知机中的计算,而模型的计算结果保持不变。\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "code", "execution_count": 4, "id": "ac75ec68", "metadata": { "execution": { "iopub.execute_input": "2023-08-18T06:58:18.669810Z", "iopub.status.busy": "2023-08-18T06:58:18.668614Z", "iopub.status.idle": "2023-08-18T06:58:18.805275Z", "shell.execute_reply": "2023-08-18T06:58:18.804217Z" }, "origin_pos": 19, "tab": [ "pytorch" ] }, "outputs": [ { "data": { "text/plain": [ "tensor([[ 0.0722, -0.0190]], grad_fn=)" ] }, "execution_count": 4, "metadata": {}, "output_type": "execute_result" } ], "source": [ "net = torch.jit.script(net)\n", "net(x)" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "a6620d01", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 23, "tab": [ "pytorch" ] }, "source": [ "我们编写与之前相同的代码,再使用`torch.jit.script`简单地转换模型,当完成这些任务后,网络就将得到优化(我们将在下面对性能进行基准测试)。\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "49dd9081", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 26 }, "source": [ "### 通过混合式编程加速\n", "\n", "为了证明通过编译获得了性能改进,我们比较了混合编程前后执行`net(x)`所需的时间。让我们先定义一个度量时间的类,它在本章中在衡量(和改进)模型性能时将非常有用。\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "code", "execution_count": 5, "id": "843b1333", "metadata": { "execution": { "iopub.execute_input": "2023-08-18T06:58:18.809971Z", "iopub.status.busy": "2023-08-18T06:58:18.809674Z", "iopub.status.idle": "2023-08-18T06:58:18.815218Z", "shell.execute_reply": "2023-08-18T06:58:18.814277Z" }, "origin_pos": 27, "tab": [ "pytorch" ] }, "outputs": [], "source": [ "#@save\n", "class Benchmark:\n", " \"\"\"用于测量运行时间\"\"\"\n", " def __init__(self, description='Done'):\n", " self.description = description\n", "\n", " def __enter__(self):\n", " self.timer = d2l.Timer()\n", " return self\n", "\n", " def __exit__(self, *args):\n", " print(f'{self.description}: {self.timer.stop():.4f} sec')" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "f007d153", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 29, "tab": [ "pytorch" ] }, "source": [ "现在我们可以调用网络两次,一次使用torchscript,一次不使用torchscript。\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "code", "execution_count": 6, "id": "429dcf27", "metadata": { "execution": { "iopub.execute_input": "2023-08-18T06:58:18.819415Z", "iopub.status.busy": "2023-08-18T06:58:18.819129Z", "iopub.status.idle": "2023-08-18T06:58:19.098924Z", "shell.execute_reply": "2023-08-18T06:58:19.097877Z" }, "origin_pos": 33, "tab": [ "pytorch" ] }, "outputs": [ { "name": "stdout", "output_type": "stream", "text": [ "无torchscript: 0.1361 sec\n", "有torchscript: 0.1204 sec\n" ] } ], "source": [ "net = get_net()\n", "with Benchmark('无torchscript'):\n", " for i in range(1000): net(x)\n", "\n", "net = torch.jit.script(net)\n", "with Benchmark('有torchscript'):\n", " for i in range(1000): net(x)" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "67b1621c", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 37, "tab": [ "pytorch" ] }, "source": [ "如以上结果所示,在`nn.Sequential`的实例被函数`torch.jit.script`脚本化后,通过使用符号式编程提高了计算性能。\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "55f995fe", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 40 }, "source": [ "### 序列化\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "77ddf279", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 42, "tab": [ "pytorch" ] }, "source": [ "编译模型的好处之一是我们可以将模型及其参数序列化(保存)到磁盘。这允许这些训练好的模型部署到其他设备上,并且还能方便地使用其他前端编程语言。同时,通常编译模型的代码执行速度也比命令式编程更快。让我们看看`save`的实际功能。\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "code", "execution_count": 7, "id": "5109f057", "metadata": { "execution": { "iopub.execute_input": "2023-08-18T06:58:19.104418Z", "iopub.status.busy": "2023-08-18T06:58:19.103582Z", "iopub.status.idle": "2023-08-18T06:58:19.271595Z", "shell.execute_reply": "2023-08-18T06:58:19.270264Z" }, "origin_pos": 46, "tab": [ "pytorch" ] }, "outputs": [ { "name": "stdout", "output_type": "stream", "text": [ "-rw-r--r-- 1 ci ci 651K Aug 18 06:58 my_mlp\r\n" ] } ], "source": [ "net.save('my_mlp')\n", "!ls -lh my_mlp*" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "7e1bcc1c", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 60 }, "source": [ "## 小结\n", "\n", "* 命令式编程使得新模型的设计变得容易,因为可以依据控制流编写代码,并拥有相对成熟的Python软件生态。\n", "* 符号式编程要求我们先定义并且编译程序,然后再执行程序,其好处是提高了计算性能。\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "b573ae3c", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 62 }, "source": [ "## 练习\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "e6c4afe2", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 64, "tab": [ "pytorch" ] }, "source": [ "1. 回顾前几章中感兴趣的模型,能提高它们的计算性能吗?\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "id": "5db5892b", "metadata": { "origin_pos": 66, "tab": [ "pytorch" ] }, "source": [ "[Discussions](https://discuss.d2l.ai/t/2788)\n" ] } ], "metadata": { "language_info": { "name": "python" }, "required_libs": [] }, "nbformat": 4, "nbformat_minor": 5 }